Skip to content
  • (952) 921-2101
  • contact@wagnertaxlaw.com
logo
  • About Us
  • Team
  • Resources
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Online Payment
  • Blog

Wagner Tax Law

Minneapolis - St. Paul Tax Attorney

FBAR The IRS’s Expanding Definition Of Willfulness In FBAR Cases

The IRS’s Expanding Definition Of Willfulness In FBAR Cases

September 18, 2018Ben WagnerCategories: FBARTags: 2011 OVD Program, 2012 OVD Program, california tax attorney, California tax lawyer, chicago tax attorney, chicago tax lawyer, FBAR, FBAR controversey, FBAR disclosure, FBAR dispute, FBAR program, Foreign Bank Account Reporting, Internal Revenue Service, Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS’s) Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVD Program), IRS', Isle of Mann Tax Treaty, Metro MN Tax Lawyer, Minneapolis Tax Attorney, Minneapolis Tax Lawyer, minnesota tax, MN Tax Attorney, Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVD Program), OVD Program, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account (FBAR), san francisco tax lawyer, sanfrancisco tax attorney, st. paul tax, st. paul tax attorney, st. paul tax lawyer, States of Guernsey Tax Treaty, States of Jersey Tax Treaty, tax attorney mn, tax lawyer mn, twin cities tax, Twin Cities Tax Attorney, Twin Cities Tax Lawyer, wi tax attorney, wisconsin tax attorney

The Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS’s) Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (Program) has elements of the Program that will no longer be available to certain taxpayers on September 28, 2018. For more on those elements, please see our previous posts here and here.

Following the IRS’s decision to eliminate elements of the Program, it also issued Technical Advice 2018-013 (TA 2018-013). TA 2018-013 sets out the IRS’s definition of willfulness and the standard of proof for establishing willfulness for purposes relating to the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) requirements.

The IRS defines willfulness pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(5)(C) as knowing violations of the FBAR requirements, but also, a willful blindness to and reckless violations of those same FBAR requirements.

There is a distinction, as the IRS notes in TA 2018-013, between the criminal standard for willfulness and the civil standard for willfulness. This distinction is detailed in Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr, (S. Ct. 2007) 551 U.S. 47 (Safeco). The IRS cites the decision in Safeco to confirm that willfulness includes only knowing violations for purposes of prosecuting a criminal case. The civil standard is not nearly so strict.

There have been a number of civil cases, including Bedrosian and Vespe, confirming that the civil standard for FBAR violations should include willful blindness and recklessness.

TA 2018-013 defines willful blindness as deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high probability of wrongdoing, to the point where the taxpayer can almost be said to have actually known the critical facts. Essentially, TA 2018-013 adopts the position that the IRS can establish willful blindness by demonstrating that the taxpayer made a conscious effort to avoid learning about reporting requirements.

Regarding the recklessness standard, the IRS has adopted the standard detailed in Vespe, which held that the recklessness standard is met if the taxpayer:

  1. Clearly ought to have known that,
  2. There was a grave risk that taxes were not being paid and, if
  3. He was in a position to find out for certain very easily.

 

Ultimately, the IRS bears the burden of proving the liability, by a preponderance of evidence, for the related civil FBAR penalty. This is a departure from previous IRS guidance, as the IRS had attempted to advance the position that a clear and convincing standard should apply, but those arguments have been rebuked by the courts in subsequent cases.

Given the September 28, 2018 deadline and faced with the updated IRS guidance, taxpayers considering a submission to the Program should consider all of the potential outcomes and act in a timely manner.

Post navigation

Previous Post
Next Post

Categories

  • Accounting
  • Appeals
  • Audits
  • Bankruptcy
  • Ben Wagner
  • Charitable Contributions
  • Claim For Refund
  • Collection Issues
  • Collection Options
  • Covid 19
  • Debt Forgiveness
  • Employment Taxes
  • Family Court
  • FBAR
  • Federal District Court
  • FOIA and GDPA
  • Foreign Trust
  • Income and Deductions
  • Independent Contractors
  • Innocent Spouse Relief
  • Installment Agreements
  • Interest Netting
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • Kathleen (Splett) Pfutzenreuter
  • Levy
  • Liens
  • Marijuana & Tax
  • Minnesota Department of Revenue
  • Minnesota Tax Court
  • Offer In Compromise
  • Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program
  • Penalties
  • Profit Motive
  • Real Estate
  • Recovering Legal Fees
  • Residency
  • Sales & Use Tax Audits
  • Settlements and Verdicts
  • Summons
  • Tom Regan
  • Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • U.S. Tax Court
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtual Currency
  • Voluntary Disclosure
  • Wayfair

Recent Posts

  • IRS Heeds Taxpayer Advocate’s Advice on Foreign Gift Tax Penalties
  • Federal Court Finds Transparency Act Unconstitutional: BOI Reporting Requirements Suspended
  • Treasury and Internal Revenue Service Crack Down on Related-Party Basis Shifting
  • Internal Revenue Service Plans Dozens of Corporate Jet Audits
  • Two Easements Conserved But Not in Perpetuity

Archives

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Copyright Wagner Tax Law 2024