Skip to content
  • (952) 921-2101
  • contact@wagnertaxlaw.com
logo
  • About Us
  • Team
  • Resources
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Online Payment
  • Blog

Wagner Tax Law

Minneapolis - St. Paul Tax Attorney

Ben Wagner Explaining the Internal Revenue Service’s FBAR Penalty Structure

Explaining the Internal Revenue Service’s FBAR Penalty Structure

April 17, 2014Ben WagnerCategories: Ben Wagner, FBARTags: 2011 OVD Program, 2012 OVD Program, Collection Information Statement for Businesses, Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed Individuals, FBAR, FBAR controversey, FBAR disclosure, FBAR dispute, FBAR penalties, FBAR program, foreign bank account, Foreign Bank Account Reporting, Form 3520, Form 3520-A, Form 433-A, Form 433-A FBAR, Form 433-B, Form 433-B FBAR, Form 5471, Form 5472, Form 8865, Form 926, Form-B FBAR, how to report a foreign bank account, Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS’s) Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVD Program), Isle of Mann Tax Treaty, Metro Minnesota Tax Attorney, Metro MN Tax Attorney, Metro MN Tax Lawyer, Minneapolis IRS Tax Audit, Minneapolis Tax Attorney, Minneapolis Tax Firm, Minneapolis Tax Lawyer, Minnesota IRS Audit, Minnesota Tax Appeal, Minnesota Tax Attorney, Minnesota Tax Audit, Minnesota Tax Firm, Minnesota Tax Lawyer, MN Tax Attorney, MN Tax Firm, MN Tax Lawyer, Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVD Program), OVD Program, report a foreign bank account, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account (FBAR), reporting a bank account abroad, States of Guernsey Tax Treaty, States of Jersey Tax Treaty, Twin Cities, Twin Cities Tax Attorney, Twin Cities Tax Lawyer

This is the fifth article in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) Frequently Asked Questions series. This series is intended to provide taxpayers and practitioners with answers to the most commonly asked questions relating to the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS’s) 2012 OVDP. Other posts in this series, offering a basic description of the OVDP and some of its core requirements, can be found here.

How does the IRS’s FBAR Penalty Structure Work?

This is a continuation from the most recent post in this series. The most critical distinction between the IRS’s assessment of FBAR penalties is the significant difference between penalties assessed as a part of the OVDP and penalties assessed outside the OVDP. Regardless of the amount in the account at issue, a taxpayer’s decision of how to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), can seem like a foregone conclusion when taking stock of this distinction.

The IRS’s OVDP Frequently Asked Questions publication contains the clearest and simplest example of the impact of the IRS’s various FBAR penalties.

In that example, the taxpayer in question owns a foreign account that has the following amounts in it during the period at issue:

Tax Year                     Amount on Deposit                         Interest Income              Account Balance
2003                               $1,000,000.00                                       $50,000.00                           $1,050,000.00
2004                                                                                                  $50,000.00                           $1,100,000.00
2005                                                                                                  $50,000.00                           $1,150,000.00
2006                                                                                                  $50,000.00                           $1,200,000.00
2007                                                                                                  $50,000.00                           $1,250,000.00
2008                                                                                                 $50,000.00                           $1,300,000.00
2009                                                                                                 $50,000.00                           $1,350,000.00
2010                                                                                                  $50,000.00                           $1,400,000.00

If the taxpayer, who for purposes of this example is in the 35% tax bracket, participated in the IRS’s OVDP, the tax and penalty assessed would total approximately $518,000.00. The tax and penalty are detailed as follows:

Type of Obligation                                      Calculation                                                      Amount Owed
Tax                                                              (8 years x $17,500.00)                                      $140,000.00
Accuracy-Related Penalty                       ($140,000.00 x 20%)                                        $28,000.00
Additional Penalties                                ($1,400,000.00 x 27.5%)                                  $385,000.00
TOTAL                                                                                                                                      $518,000.00

The $518,000.00 is a fraction of what the taxpayer might pay if they do not participate in the program and their failure to report is discovered at a later date. The amount that could be assessed in that scenario, which we covered in our most recent post in this series, was more than $4,000,000.00. Even in the OVDP, the taxpayer will have to pay the IRS more than a third of what was in the foreign account that was not reported. However, that is significantly less than being assessed for three times the amount in that very same account.

Please check back in the weeks and months ahead for posts detailing the concept of “quiet” disclosure and the risks of adopting such an approach.

Post navigation

Previous Post
Next Post

Categories

  • Accounting
  • Appeals
  • Audits
  • Bankruptcy
  • Ben Wagner
  • Charitable Contributions
  • Claim For Refund
  • Collection Issues
  • Collection Options
  • Covid 19
  • Debt Forgiveness
  • Employment Taxes
  • Family Court
  • FBAR
  • Federal District Court
  • FOIA and GDPA
  • Foreign Trust
  • Income and Deductions
  • Independent Contractors
  • Innocent Spouse Relief
  • Installment Agreements
  • Interest Netting
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • Kathleen (Splett) Pfutzenreuter
  • Levy
  • Liens
  • Marijuana & Tax
  • Minnesota Department of Revenue
  • Minnesota Tax Court
  • Offer In Compromise
  • Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program
  • Penalties
  • Profit Motive
  • Real Estate
  • Recovering Legal Fees
  • Residency
  • Sales & Use Tax Audits
  • Settlements and Verdicts
  • Summons
  • Tom Regan
  • Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • U.S. Tax Court
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtual Currency
  • Voluntary Disclosure
  • Wayfair

Recent Posts

  • What’s in a Name?: The ABA Attempts to Define “Cryptocurrency”
  • Is The IRS Going to the Moon?: President Biden’s Executive Order on Digital Assets
  • A Qualified Offer the IRS Could Refuse
  • A Sordid Tale of Donkeys and Horses: Tax Court Style – Part Two
  • A Sordid Tale of Donkeys and Horses: Tax Court Style – Part One

Archives

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Copyright Wagner Tax Law 2018